Work

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Using Exemplar Papers to Improve Students’ Ability to Self-Evaluate with a Rubric

Publique Deposited

MLA citation style (9th ed.)

Wilson, Kristy J, and Kinkade, Karla. The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Using Exemplar Papers to Improve Students’ Ability to Self-evaluate with a Rubric. . 2020. mushare.marian.edu/concern/generic_works/d4d1b4a3-ed3a-4b34-9115-de4aa37e69bb?locale=fr.

APA citation style (7th ed.)

W. K. J, & K. Karla. (2020). The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Using Exemplar Papers to Improve Students’ Ability to Self-Evaluate with a Rubric. https://mushare.marian.edu/concern/generic_works/d4d1b4a3-ed3a-4b34-9115-de4aa37e69bb?locale=fr

Chicago citation style (CMOS 17, author-date)

Wilson, Kristy J., and Kinkade, Karla. The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Using Exemplar Papers to Improve Students’ Ability to Self-Evaluate with a Rubric. 2020. https://mushare.marian.edu/concern/generic_works/d4d1b4a3-ed3a-4b34-9115-de4aa37e69bb?locale=fr.

Note: These citations are programmatically generated and may be incomplete.

Research suggests that providing students with a rubric increases scientific writing skills; however, we have found that the quality of scientific writing in a course-based undergraduate research experience (CURE) is poor even with a detailed rubric. We tested whether requiring students to use a rubric to evaluate high-, intermediate-, and low-quality examples of de-identified student writing improved students’ ability to self-evaluate scientific writing using a rubric. We found that providing students with exemplar papers along with a writing rubric improved the students’ ability to self-evaluate, and ultimately improved the quality of scientific writing in undergraduate students enrolled in a CURE.

Presented in the Active/Collaborative Learning track.

Creator
Language
Mot-clé
Date created
Resource type
Source
  • stlw11

Rights statement

Contenu